FirstVirtue

Rights, justice, policy and all things digital.

Full verification is the next step. Airbnb’s attempt to push all 4m of its users to show hard evidence of who they are, like a passport or driver’s licence, is designed to give it a leg-up over less-trusted sites where ordinary people transact with strangers.

If Airbnb is right and people crave reassurance about real-world identity, a race to the top will follow. One of the early hopes of the internet visionaries – that the virtual world could exist separate from and in parallel to the real one – will have been disproved.

There are drawbacks to the pursuit of verification. One is that it stands to make the costs of online identity theft much greater. When verified accounts are hacked, the higher level of trust invested in them can make the costs all the greater – as when the officially sanctioned Twitter account of news service AP was taken over by a group calling itself the Syrian Electronic Army.

Another potential drawback is the impact that the increase in verified traffic will have on the shrinking amount of truly anonymous communication. The ranks of the unknown will be made up largely of political dissidents, criminals and anyone paranoid about online surveillance. Particularly in politically repressive parts of the world, freedom of expression could get squeezed out along with other forms of illicit activity.

Inside Business: Online anonymity to be confined to virtual history - FT.com, via @welovebold (via new-aesthetic)

New pressure for identity assurance from Internet users not just governments.

(via new-aesthetic)

A detached reason that cannot enter into the viewpoints of others cannot be fully objective because it cannot access whole areas of the real world of human experience….In a pluralist world, there is no hope of understanding people who live according to different values if we only judge them from the outside, from what we imagine to be an objective point of view but is really one infused with our own subjectivity.

Julian Baggini, Aeon magazine.
http://www.aeonmagazine.com/world-views/julian-baggini-i-love-kierkegaard/
cosmarxpolitan:

Cosmarxpolitan, Issue 6
8 steps to make extra pounds (and enemies) disappear

Ok, so the actual amount of political theory here is pretty small, but, hey, so what?

cosmarxpolitan:

Cosmarxpolitan, Issue 6

8 steps to make extra pounds (and enemies) disappear

Ok, so the actual amount of political theory here is pretty small, but, hey, so what?

Reblogged from COSMARXPOLITAN

I just noticed something strange on Wikipedia. It appears that gradually, over time, editors have begun the process of moving women, one by one, alphabetically, from the “American Novelists” category to the “American Women Novelists” subcategory. So far, female authors whose last names begin with A or B have been most affected, although many others have, too.

The intention appears to be to create a list of “American Novelists” on Wikipedia that is made up almost entirely of men. The category lists 3,837 authors, and the first few hundred of them are mainly men. The explanation at the top of the page is that the list of “American Novelists” is too long, and therefore the novelists have to be put in subcategories whenever possible.

Too bad there isn’t a subcategory for “American Men Novelists.”

Wikipedia’s sexism toward female novelists (via explore-blog) From the NY Times…

(via explore-blog)

Reblogged from Explore